High (Barracuda)In CISA KEVExploitation activity (Barracuda)No login needed (ESG)Barracuda appliances

Are your Barracuda appliances exposed to CVE-2026-116606?

CISA added both CVE-2026-116606 and CVE-2026-111560 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue on 10 November 2026. Barracuda reports exploitation activity affecting a small number of organizations, without naming which CVE. Both stay High (9.3 and 8.6). Update ESG and apply the product patches now.

Update 10 November: CISA adds both CVEs to KEV

CISA added both CVE-2026-116606 and CVE-2026-111560 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue on 10 November 2026. The KEV catalogue version 2026.11.10 was released at 19:03 GMT that day (1,779 entries). KEV records a date added of 10 November 2026 for both CVEs, not a time they were inserted. CISA's due date is 13 November 2026; that due date binds US federal agencies. Patch now regardless. CISA's required action is to apply vendor mitigations and follow CISA's Forensics Triage Requirements and BOD 26-04, and to collect evidence before changing systems where possible. CISA's KEV descriptions say each vulnerability can be chained with the other; that is CISA describing what is possible, not Barracuda saying the attacks used both. Barracuda, in its Trust Center advisory updated on 9 November 2026 at 9:00pm EST (02:00 GMT on 10 November), says: "We have identified exploitation activity affecting a small number of organizations." Barracuda does not name which CVE was exploited and has not said the observed activity used both CVEs or chained them. Barracuda's own wording is still conditional: "If exploited in combination, these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to bypass authorization controls and obtain root access to the device." Barracuda still rates both CVEs High. Neither Barracuda nor CISA has published indicators of compromise. KEV lists Load Balancer and ADC as two products; Barracuda lists one (Load Balancer ADC). We follow Barracuda (six products). Advice on this page is labelled as Barracuda's, CISA's or ours.

At a Glance

Based on Barracuda, NVD and CISA as of 10 November 2026. Last updated 10 November 2026, 19:25 GMT.

2 Nov

Barracuda discloses CVE-2026-116606 and CVE-2026-111560, found by security researchers, and releases security patches.

2 Nov

The CVE records are published. NVD lists both as Awaiting Analysis.

3 Nov

The flaws are reported publicly. At this point neither is in CISA KEV and no exploitation is reported.

5 Nov

Barracuda changes Authentication Required for CVE-2026-116606 to No (Administrative UI Access Required).

9 Nov

Barracuda updates its advisory (9:00pm EST, 02:00 GMT on 10 Nov): it has identified exploitation activity affecting a small number of organizations. It does not name the CVE. Severity stays High.

10 Nov

CISA lists both CVEs in the KEV catalogue (date added 10 November 2026; catalogue 2026.11.10 was released at 19:03 GMT, 1,779 entries). Due date 13 November 2026 for US federal agencies. Patch now regardless.

Now

Patch, confirm the Admin UI is internal, rotate credentials, and hunt for compromise on appliances that were exposed.

Affected and fixed versions

ProductAffectedFix
Email Security Gateway (ESG)Both CVEs. Barracuda: all versions. CVE record: earlier than 9.4.0.030Campus ESG article: firmware 9.4.0.029 or later (Advanced > Firmware Update). We follow Barracuda. Trust Center patch IDs: BNSF-40425 (9.4.017 and later), BNSF-40430 (before 9.4.017). The Trust Center writes 9.4.017 and Campus writes 9.4.0.17; we treat those as the same build. That figure is the patch-ID split, not the fixed-in firmware version, and we do not treat it as equal to 9.4.0.029. Below 9.1, Campus says update in two steps.
Load Balancer ADCCVE-2026-111560, up to 6.4.0Patch BNADC-16586 and the latest firmware. Confirm in the web interface that the security patch is applied. The patch does not change the firmware number.
Web Application Firewall (WAF)CVE-2026-111560, up to 11.0.1Patch BNADC-16586 (as listed by Barracuda) and the latest firmware. Confirm in the web interface that the security patch is applied. The patch does not change the firmware number.
Web Security Gateway (WSG)CVE-2026-111560, up to 16.1.100.100Patch BNYF-24789 and the latest firmware. Confirm in the web interface that the security patch is applied. The patch does not change the firmware number.
Message Archiver (BMA)CVE-2026-111560, up to 5.5.4.0Patch BNMA-32468 and the latest firmware. Confirm in the web interface that the security patch is applied. The patch does not change the firmware number.
WAF Control Center (WCC)CVE-2026-111560, up to 2.2.1Patch BNWF-60060 and the latest firmware. Confirm in the web interface that the security patch is applied. The patch does not change the firmware number.

Affected versions for the non-ESG products come from the CVE records, which list them as "up to and including". Barracuda pushes security patches automatically unless auto-updates are turned off. If a patch has not been applied automatically, Barracuda says to apply it manually as soon as possible.

The ESG version figures do not all agree

Sources give different ESG version figures, and we keep that disagreement visible. Barracuda's Campus ESG article says to update to 9.4.0.029 and check that the appliance reports 9.4.0.029 or later. The CVE record for CVE-2026-116606 says versions earlier than 9.4.0.030 are affected. We follow Barracuda (9.4.0.029 or later). The Trust Center writes the patch-ID split as 9.4.017 (BNSF-40425 for 9.4.017 and later, BNSF-40430 before that) and the Campus ESG article writes 9.4.0.17; we treat 9.4.017 and 9.4.0.17 as the same build. That figure is the patch-ID split, not the fixed-in firmware version, and we do not treat it as equal to 9.4.0.029. Confirm the version each appliance reports after updating, and move to the latest firmware it offers if you want no doubt.

Confirm the patch on every product except ESG

On Load Balancer ADC, WAF, Web Security Gateway, Message Archiver and WAF Control Center, the security patch does not change the firmware number, and Barracuda publishes no fixed firmware version. Checking the version is not enough. Confirm in each appliance's web interface that the patch ID in the table is applied.

What to Do in the Next 24 Hours

Proactive on the left. Reactive on the right. Tick both tracks.

Proactive: Check Exposure and Update

Barracuda's advice is to update, apply missed patches and restrict the Admin UI. Our advice is to patch now across every client appliance, confirm the patch and that the Admin UI is off the internet, and rotate credentials.

Free Detection Pack

Built by the CybaVerse threat hunt team for businesses, internal IT teams and MSPs. Check each appliance's version and hunt for signs of exploitation. Everything is read-only.

Verdicts

  • PATCHEDESG on 9.4.0.029 or later.
  • LIKELY VULNERABLEESG below 9.4.0.029 (flagged for a two-step update below 9.1), or another product at or below the affected version in the CVE record. The security patch may already be applied without a firmware change, so confirm in the web interface.
  • UNKNOWNAnother product above the affected range, as Barracuda gives no fixed firmware number to check against, or an unknown product or version.

Exit codes

CodeMeaning
0All PATCHED
1Any LIKELY VULNERABLE
2Any UNKNOWN, none vulnerable
3Error, such as no inputs or an unreadable file

MSPs can use the exit code in RMM or scheduled jobs to flag appliances at scale. Both checkers also print the CISA KEV status.

Know the limits

  • Both checkers are read-only and offline. They only compare version strings, a CSV and an exported syslog file you give them, never contact an appliance or its admin interface and send no network traffic.
  • On every product except ESG, the patch does not change the firmware number. A version check cannot show the patch is applied, so confirm it in the appliance's web interface.
  • None of the KQL has been run against a live tenant. It is syntax-reviewed only. Log fields and keywords marked UNVERIFIED FIELD or UNVERIFIED are assumptions, because Barracuda has not published log strings for these CVEs and syslog layouts differ by product. Set the admin ports to your own.
  • The Sigma rules convert to Kusto without a pipeline. Add the table mapping (CommonSecurityLog or Syslog) yourself. A syslog line count from the checker is not evidence of compromise.
  • The pack contains no indicators of compromise, because neither Barracuda nor CISA has published any, even after the 9 November exploitation update and the 10 November KEV add. IPs in the queries are documentation placeholders.
  • The configuration restore or import hunt (Q8 and its Sigma rule) is our pattern, not a Barracuda indicator, and its log keywords are unverified.

Reactive: How to Hunt (Our Advice)

These hunts are our advice, not Barracuda's or CISA's. CISA requires forensic triage as part of its KEV required action (that binds US federal agencies) and says to collect evidence before changing systems where possible. Barracuda reports exploitation activity affecting a small number of organizations but has published no indicators of compromise, so hunt for behaviour. Go back to before 2 November 2026 for every appliance whose admin interface was reachable from the internet. If an appliance was exposed before it was patched, treat it as possibly compromised and rotate its credentials. CybaOps can run these hunts across your estate or your clients'.

If you find something (our advice)

  • Treat the device as compromised. Isolate the appliance by restricting network access. Keep it powered and do not wipe it.
  • Keep the evidence: export syslog and the configuration.
  • Contact Barracuda Technical Support.
  • Rebuild or replace the appliance if compromise is confirmed or cannot be ruled out.
  • Rotate every credential the appliance held or saw, including admin, LDAP or Active Directory bind, SMTP relay and API credentials. UK organisations can also report to the NCSC.

Patched does not mean clean

The patch stops new exploitation. It does not remove a backdoor, a changed configuration, a new admin account or a cron job planted before you updated. In 2023, updating ESG did not remove attackers who were already in. Do not rely on the patch alone.

Barracuda CVE-2026-116606 and CVE-2026-111560 FAQ

Short answers based on Barracuda, NVD and CISA as of 10 November 2026.

What is CVE-2026-116606?

CVE-2026-116606 is an authorisation bypass in Barracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) that needs no login. On 5 November 2026 Barracuda changed its Authentication Required field for this CVE to No (Administrative UI Access Required): no login is needed, but the attacker must be able to reach the Admin UI. The CVE record says an attacker can invoke a configuration import function and restore a crafted backup, changing the appliance's global configuration. It is scored CVSS 4.0 9.3 and affects ESG only.

What is CVE-2026-111560?

CVE-2026-111560 is OS command injection through the timezone configuration field. Shell characters in that field are not filtered, so an administrator can run commands as root. Barracuda lists it as Authentication Required: Yes (Administrative Access). Some news reports describe it as usable without authentication; we follow Barracuda. It is scored CVSS 4.0 8.6 and sits in shared Barracuda code, so it affects ESG, Load Balancer ADC, WAF, Web Security Gateway, Message Archiver and WAF Control Center.

How serious is it when they are chained?

CISA's KEV descriptions say each vulnerability can be chained with the other; that is CISA describing what is possible, not Barracuda saying the attacks used both. Barracuda's own wording is still conditional: if exploited in combination, these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to bypass authorization controls and obtain root access to the device. Barracuda has not said the observed activity used both CVEs or chained them. Barracuda also says successful exploitation needs access to the administrative interface, so appliances with admin pages on the internet are most at risk. Barracuda's Trust Center rates both flaws High.

Is either CVE being exploited or in CISA KEV?

CISA added both CVE-2026-116606 and CVE-2026-111560 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue on 10 November 2026. The KEV catalogue version 2026.11.10 was released at 19:03 GMT that day (1,779 entries). KEV records a date added of 10 November 2026 for both CVEs, not a time they were inserted. CISA's due date is 13 November 2026; that due date binds US federal agencies. Patch now regardless. CISA also requires forensic triage, and says to collect evidence before changing systems where possible. CISA's KEV descriptions say each vulnerability can be chained with the other; that is CISA describing what is possible, not Barracuda saying the attacks used both. Barracuda updated its Trust Center advisory on 9 November 2026 at 9:00pm EST (02:00 GMT on 10 November) to say: We have identified exploitation activity affecting a small number of organizations. Barracuda does not name which CVE was exploited and has not said the observed activity used both CVEs or chained them. Barracuda's own wording is still conditional: if exploited in combination, these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to bypass authorization controls and obtain root access to the device. Known ransomware campaign use in KEV is Unknown. Barracuda still rates both flaws High. Neither Barracuda nor CISA has published indicators of compromise. We re-checked NVD at 19:15 GMT on 10 November 2026: both records are still Awaiting Analysis (last modified 3 November 2026). We re-opened the official CVE records at the same time; both were last updated on 3 November 2026, and the CISA SSVC field in those records (dated 2 November 2026) still says Exploitation none, which is now out of date. KEV lists Load Balancer and ADC as two products; Barracuda lists one (Load Balancer ADC). We follow Barracuda (six products). Separately, the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security updated its advisory AV26-1112 on 9 November to say that open source reporting indicates CVE-2026-116606 is exploited in the wild; that is the Cyber Centre's statement, not Barracuda's.

Which ESG version fixes it?

Barracuda's Campus ESG article says to update to firmware 9.4.0.029 or later under Advanced > Firmware Update. The CVE record says versions earlier than 9.4.0.030 are affected. We follow Barracuda (9.4.0.029 or later). The Trust Center splits patch IDs at 9.4.017 (BNSF-40425 for 9.4.017 and later, BNSF-40430 before that) and the Campus ESG article writes 9.4.0.17; we treat 9.4.017 and 9.4.0.17 as the same build. That figure is the patch-ID split, not the fixed-in firmware version, and we do not treat it as equal to 9.4.0.029. Check the version your appliance reports after updating, and move to the latest firmware it offers if you want no doubt.

Our ESG is older than 9.1. What changes?

You cannot jump straight to 9.4.0.029. Barracuda says appliances below 9.1 need two update steps. Update once, check the reported version, update again, then confirm it reports 9.4.0.029 or later. Reboot if prompted and check the version again.

How do we know the other products are fixed?

For ADC, WAF, Web Security Gateway, Message Archiver and WAF Control Center, Barracuda fixes CVE-2026-111560 with a security patch and gives no fixed firmware number. The patch does not change the firmware number, so the version alone cannot prove you are safe. Confirm in each appliance's web interface that the patch ID is applied.

What should we do if the admin interface was on the internet?

Take it off the internet or limit it to management IPs or a VPN, update, then rotate admin credentials and API keys. Then hunt for unexpected timezone changes, configuration restores, unknown admin sessions, odd processes or outbound connections and new files or cron jobs from before you updated.

Does the patch remove an attacker who is already in?

No. The patch stops new exploitation but leaves any backdoor, changed configuration, new admin account or cron job already in place. In 2023 updating ESG did not remove attackers who were already in. If you suspect compromise, our advice is to treat the device as compromised: isolate it, keep its logs, contact Barracuda support and rebuild if needed.

What if a patch did not apply automatically?

Barracuda says that if a patch has not been automatically applied, customers should apply the appropriate patch manually as soon as possible, and that customers who turned off automatic patches should set devices to receive them automatically again. Barracuda also says a device several firmware versions out of date may need more than one update, and that Barracuda Support (support@barracuda.com) can help verify firmware or apply the patch.

We are an MSP. Where do we start?

Export an inventory of every Barracuda appliance across your clients as name, product and version, and run the free checker against it. Use the exit codes to flag LIKELY VULNERABLE and UNKNOWN appliances, take their admin interfaces off the internet first, and confirm the patch in each web interface.

Protect Your Edge, and Your Clients'

CybaOps monitors your servers, endpoints, network appliances and cloud workloads, whether that's your own business or your clients'. UK-based analysts monitor alerts 24/7, run these threat hunts and act on pre-approved response actions, and CybaOps drives remediation through to a verified fix, so proactive checks and reactive response happen in one place.